Reflections from the IAF Seminar on
Civil Society and Politics
(November 8 – 20, 2009)
by Paola Margarita Deles
 |
| Paola
Margarita Deles |
Two developments related to the coming 2010 elections were playing
in my mind as I traveled from Manila to Gummersbach to attend the
IAF seminar on “Civil Society and Politics: The Role of NGOs
and Political Parties.” The first and more recent development
was the announcement of Sen. Chiz Escudero that he was leaving the
Nationalist People’s Coalition, his political party for the
last 11 years. In his speech, he claimed that any person aspiring
for the presidency should not belong to any group because his party
should be “all Filipino people.” That a young and popular
politician like Sen. Escudero is comfortable and even proud to talk
about political parties negatively (whatever his real reasons may
be) is one of the clear signs of weakness in our party system. Coming
from the NGO sector, I was keen to know more about this “Other”
– What role
should political parties be playing in
Philippine politics? Can strengthening our party system impact on
democratic politics and good governance? What reforms are needed
to enable political parties to operate more effectively and become
more relevant in the political life and democracy of our nation?
The other and less recent but (for me) more significant development
pertains to the decision of Sen. Noynoy Aquino and his team to
make his presidential campaign a “people’s campaign.”
His decision to run, after all, was in response to the call made
to him by ordinary citizens. The implication of a people’s
campaign is that it has two tracks: a “conventional”
track led by his party, the Liberal Party of the Philippines,
and a “non-conventional” track led by volunteer citizen
groups and supported by various NGOs. The two tracks are meant
to be closely coordinated but operating separately.
For me, the people’s campaign of Sen. Aquino carries the
potential, promise and challenges of greater cooperation between
the Liberal Party and NGOs, particularly if Sen. Aquino’s
presidential run is successful. This brought to my mind the following
questions: When working together, what roles should each play?
How do we ensure that the work of parties and NGOs complement
each other? How de we avoid duplication, conflict or tension between
the two groups?
During the two week IAF seminar in Germany, I had the valuable
opportunity to listen and absorb inputs from our seminar facilitators
and resource persons and, more importantly, to begin exploring
answers to my questions together with like-minded peers from other
developing countries.
A political party, according to one of the definitions given
to us in the seminar, is “a group of like-minded citizens
looking to realize their shared political ideas.” Functioning
parties can play an important role in the political life of a
nation as mediator between citizens and government institutions,
as aggregator of interests of various groups, and in giving political
direction.
“What would democracy look like if there was no political
parties?” one of our readings asked. Without parties, “voters
would be hard put to work out what individual candidates stood
for or intended to do once elected. Without parties, politics
might degenerate into a fight between tiny factions, each promoting
its narrow self-interest.”
A talk by one of the resource persons, Prof. Werner Patzelt,
clued me into why the party system in the Philippines is weak.
He asserted that there are two major conditions for a strong party
system: the first is a parliamentary form of government and the
second is proportional representation. Neither of these is present
in our country, where we have a presidential form of government
and a first-past-the-post electoral system. Other factors that
contribute to and at the same time are aggravated by our weak
party system include: the emphasis on personalities over platforms,
the reliance of many parties on funding from donors with self
and business interests, and the lack of opportunity and appreciation
for political engagement among the electorate. A major paradigm
shift and serious reforms are thus required if we want a working,
dynamic party system that can enhance governance and raise our
fragile democracy to a higher level.
The IAF seminar highlighted the similarities and differences
between political parties and NGOs, which serves as bases for
cooperation and complementation between these two groups. Unlike
NGOs, which at most can only influence governance, political parties
aim for constitutional mandate and direct access to power over
government decision-making processes. While political parties
need to look at comprehensive programs and platforms, many NGOs
focus on particular advocacies and have expertise in specific
issues. NGOs, therefore, can work with political parties to impact
on policies related to their advocacies, while political parties
can work with NGOs to sharpen and enrich particular areas of their
political platforms and programs. In addition, like-minded NGOs
and political parties can tap into each other’s networks
and constituencies to expand their outreach and support base toward
shared goals and interests.
Based on various country experiences, collaboration between parties
and NGOs can be very productive, but must be done with care. While
political parties and NGOs may share some common objectives and
values, there must always be recognition and appreciation for
the fact that the two are distinct species created for different
reasons. When working together, there should be mutual respect
and space for these differences.
Now back in Manila, equipped with new information and the beginnings
of ideas for further study and action, I feel fortunate to be
working for an NGO that seeks to connect the dots between Democratic
Politics, Good Governance and Development Outcomes. With my organization,
I hope to continue the learning process that had begun for me
at the IAF seminar. I look forward to helping convene a study
group that can look at existing and new proposals for practical
reforms to strengthen the country’s political party system.
And after the new president is elected in May 2010 (with fingers
crossed that it is my preferred candidate!), I am hoping there
will be an opportunity to document the experience of the Liberal
Party and NGOs in working together on a presidential campaign,
to reflect and assess this experience, and to plot out steps to
enhance and sustain healthy engagement during and beyond the new
president’s term.