Reflections from Gummersbach
(October 27– November 03, 2006)
by Philip Peñaflor
 |
| Philip
Peñaflor |
When I joined the electronic forum on New Public Management (NPM),
I was glad to gather insights from fellow participants about the
need to change or the need for reforms in current administration
practices of various governments, in order to maximize government
resources and become more effective in providing services to the
citizens for their satisfaction.
The cry for reform is very loud and clear, but the question is
how to do it. At Gummersbach this question was answered by the
speakers and resource persons and also by the participants themselves.
One of the things that impressed me was the Gummersbach Burger Service (Citizen’s Service) where the local government
of Gummersbach provides its citizens with a window with which
they can go to their local government for assistance on various
concerns, and the citizens feel that the local government is concerned
for them. At the Burger Service the citizens come for
advice on their particular concerns, and they are well attended
to by the Burger Service staff. Everyone is well received
and given equal attention. There is a benchmark that every transaction
should be finished in 10 minutes, meaning to say that the citizen
seeking assistance is responded to in 10 minutes time. In that
way the citizen is not left waiting forever wondering whether
his or her concern will be responded to.
In the Burger Service this is how it works: A citizen comes in,
takes a number, finds a chair in a corner while waiting for his
or her turn to be called. If the citizen has a child with him
or her, there is a children’s corner with some toys for
the children to play with while their parents are being attended
to by the staff. It’s not only that the Burger Service attends
to the concerns of its citizens, but the way it is organized is
designed to make the citizens feel welcome and comfortable.
I am thinking of my own country’s situation where citizens
find it difficult to get the assistance of their local government.
Here in the Philippines, traditionally when citizens go to their
municipal hall for assistance they are scrutinized according to
how they look like. If they are well-dressed they will be well
attended to by the local government staff, but if they are dressed
poorly or look shabby they will be bypassed or dismissed as beggars
or nuisances, and they will be attended to last. And normally
the transactions will take time or will drag on because some of
the staff cannot be located or if attending to something else,
the citizens coming for assistance are at the mercy of their availability.
Worse, if after a long wait the needed staff does not come, the
citizen will be told to come back the following day. So the citizen,
who might have come from a distant village and feeling weary from
the long wait, goes out of the town hall frustrated and disappointed.
But the predicament of the ordinary citizen does not end there,
if he comes back the following day he could face the same situation
of the previous day and be told to come back again the next day
and so on.
I had that experience several years ago when facilitating the
transfer of a land title certificate. My brother bought a piece
of land from his friend at a lower cost than usual on condition
that my brother would take care of the transfer of the certificate
of ownership. And my brother asked me to do the task. So I went
to the local Register of Deeds and inquired how the transfer of
the land title could be done. I was given the instructions such
as going to the Bureau of Internal Revenue for assessment of the
value for taxation purposes, then paying at the Treasury, etc.
Among the problems I encountered with this process was that the
location of the other offices I needed were some distance from
each other. I had to take a jeepney (Philippine jeep)
ride to go from one office to another just to get somebody else’s
signature or to pay some dues. In one office I was told to come
back twice because the officer that would sign the papers was
absent or was somewhere else. It took me three days to finish
the transactions and a week to get the new land title in the name
of my brother. Somebody told me that that was already as fast
as it gets.
The main challenge of NPM in this country is how we can make
government responsive to the needs of its citizens. Sometime ago,
there was a TV advertisement sponsored by the Civil Service Commission
about good government service. The slogan was “Mamamayan
muna, hindi mamaya na.” It means “to attend to
the citizens first and not other things first.” The message
was very clear. It was an attempt to educate both public servants
and citizens on the right of the citizens to an efficient government
service. Maybe it gained some awareness for a while, but when
the ad was no longer played the business of “mamaya
na” came back as usual.
So what are the public officials in office for if they are not
attending to the concerns of the citizens? Are they there for
themselves only? Unfortunately that is what seems to be. I may
be making some sweeping statements here, but that it is not the
intention. I recognize that in many local government offices,
as well as in several other government departments, there are
public officials and staff who are conscientious in their responsibilities.
However these could be more of the exceptions to the general observation
that public officials are in office more to serve themselves rather
than the public.
Going back to the Gummersbach experience, the local governments
are not being asked to do big or impossible things. The Gummersbach
Burger Service is a simple and doable activity that local governments
in the Philippines can easily undertake. Of course there can be
other innovations that we could do, but the Burger Service model
is good example to begin with.