On New Public Management Applicability
and Practice
(October 27– November 03, 2006)
by Cecille Rose P. Sabig
 |
| Cecille
Rose P. Sabig |
It wass a friend, fellow Ateneo Human Rights Center (AHRC) intern
and then AHRC’s internship director, Attorney Myrfi Gonzalez,
who encouraged us, a group of alumni interns, to join the online
seminars sponsored by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Presently
working as a court attorney for a judicial institution and specializing
in judicial decision-making, I thought it would be interesting to
be learn something different yet applicable to my work. Thus I applied
to the online seminar on New Public Management (NPM) believing it
was a topic that would be helpful and insightful. True enough, the
seminar did not disappoint me.
As early as the online phase, exchanges with my fellow participants
were already stimulating and interesting. I was able to share
my Philippine experiences and views regarding public administration,
political structures and reforms with participants from different
countries. The online phase of the seminar was significant in
helping me bond faster with fellow participants during the Phase
II seminar in Germany. It was interesting to finally meet in person,
people whose views I had previously either agreed or disagreed
with during the online phase. The lively discussions and debates
throughout the plenary sessions and working groups continued throughout.
It was quite interesting to compare our countries continuously.
As one Argentinean participant aptly observed, despite the distance
and the differences in culture and language, the problems in governance
faced by our countries were actually similar.
The applicability of NPM practices was my constant realization
throughout the seminar.
One important topic was the Burgerservice (Citizen’s Bureau)
in the town of Gummersbach. Through a well-furnished office with
very able and well-trained employees, citizens in this town are
immediately assisted with their various concerns. Inside the Burgerservice,
the needs of the citizens are addressed, and their papers or documents,
such as passports and driver’s licenses, are processed.
The Bureau does not simply answer queries that their citizens
may ask, but immediately has the capability to get things rolling
for the visitor.
The visit to the Burgerservice has gotten me frustrated that
this simple yet very effective concept is not being used in the
Philippines. Burgerservice is so far advanced from the usual information
booth or offices found in the halls of our local government units.
Our information booths are a far cry from the kind of service
that the Burgerservice is giving. The biggest block in putting
up this type of office in our country is not the lack of demand
or budget, but rather the lack of information that this citizen’s
bureau does exist and can make a big difference in lives of our
citizens. Both local leaders and citizens greatly need to know
about the existence of this office.
The non-existence of efficient offices in this country like the
Burgerservice has reminded me that the mindset of customer orientation
has yet to be developed here. Setting up that mindset continues
to be a challenge today. I believe however that prioritizing customer
orientation will actually work in the favor of local leaders.
Indeed, when citizens feel that their leaders consider them important,
they will also show their appreciation to these leaders. This
country needs leaders who have open minds and are sincere in applying
and practicing customer orientation in their administration.
Mayor Uwe Ufer, mayor of the town of Huckeswagen, also offered
a lot of insights on governance. He shared a lot of progressive
ideas and various ways of adapting NPM concepts. Mayor Ufer showed
that organizational structures can be adjusted to fit the needs
of the citizens, and that a town can set aside an old system for
budgeting and adhere to a different but effective system. The
town’s style of governance adjusts to the needs of its citizens
and not sticks to the usual “template” of governance.
While political will is a must for our leaders, we also need strong
leaders with the resourcefulness and ingenuity of Mayor Ufer.
Finally, I greatly appreciated the well-maintained landscape,
clean surroundings and well-planned towns of Germany. While this
may seem aesthetic, the efficiency of the government’s service
is easily seen through the eyes of a visitor coming from a third-world
country with poorly maintained roads and garbage piles in constant
sight.
The NPM seminar was indeed a venue for life-long knowledge, lasting
friendships and fond memories for me. The drinks and the enjoyable
dances at the bar, the nightly table tennis games between different
nationalities, the few lessons on foreign words, enjoyable early
morning walks through the town, the beautiful and lush surroundings
of our school, and the constant visits to the grocery store are
just among the many special things that I will remember in the
years ahead. The faces of my fellow participants, our moderators
and interpreters, will continue to haunt me as I continue to miss
all of them. And most importantly, the taste of excellent German
beer will continue to beckon me back to Germany.
I have returned to the Philippines with a lot of learning. The
experience I had in Germany has definitely made me believe in
the soundness and applicability of NPM.
I had previously vowed to continue to be a human rights advocate,
having been a human rights intern while I was in law school, and
an environmentalist, having worked with an environmental NGO for
several years. This seminar has again made me vow to a third way
of life – to be an NPM practitioner – in my work and
in my dealings with the government. Advocating for the practice
of NPM in this country will actually do this country good. And
this advocacy can start with me.