Growth, Development and Institutions
- FNSt Supports the Annual Conference of the Philippine Economic
Society (PES)
 |
| FNF Resident Representative
Mr. Siegfried Herzog at the Philippine Economic Society Conference |
The
44th annual meeting of the Philippine Economic
Society was held on November
21-22 in the
Bangko Sentral
ng Pilippinas. The Friedrich
Naumann Foundation co-sponsored
this event, which was devoted
to the topic of
"Growth,
Development and Institutions."
The main thrust of the conference
was to highlight the crucial importance
of efficient and reliable institutions
that provide a framework for the
market economy, safeguard property
rights, ensure competition and
enforce contracts. They are also
important to organize the efficient
provision of physical and social
infrastructure, including health
and education. The programme and
links to the presentations can
be found at the website of PES:
www.phileconsociety.org
The keynote speech by Jaime
Augusto Zobel de Ayala II struck
an optimistic note, outlining
some ideas how the present positive
economic trends could be made
more lasting. He focused on
the role of the business sector,
the need to measure itself by
global standards and the need
to be more creative in developing
new goods and services, including
some aimed specifically at the
needs of the poor. He acknowledged
the influence of Prof. Prahalads
book “The fortune
at the bottom of the pyramid”
and gave examples of his
own companies new approach,
for example in delivering water
to poor neighborhoods in cooperation
with local communities. "Individuals
and families in the lower economic
strata need products and services
just as much, if not more, than
the upper economic members of
society. The challenge is to
find ways of serving their needs
in a manner that is affordable,
accessible, and viable,"
said Mr. Jaime Augusto
Zobel de Ayala II.
The first panel discussion focused on the conference theme,
contrasting the performance of other Asian countries with
that of the Philippines, and drawing lessons from it. Discussions
centred on the “Philippine Paradox”,
as the World Bank representative Joachim von Amsberg
called the relatively poor performance of the country during
the last decades despite its good endowment with natural resources
and good educational achievements. This was blamed mainly
on weak institutions and bad policies - failures of
collective action, as Dean Raul Favella from
the University of the Philippines called them.
The afternoon was taken up by parallel sessions on various
specific topics, ranging from monetary policy and investment
to decentralization and education, thus looking at a broad
range of relevant institutional factors.
The second day looked in more detail at the regulatory and
governance environment. Gilberto Llanto looked
at the crisis in governance by analyzing the strength of vested
interests in the Filipino political structures and their ability
to capture regulatory agencies, perpetuating their dominance
and excluding competitors to the detriment of overall economic
performance – a structural weakness noted in many discussions.
 |
| From Left: Prof. Arsenio M.
Balisacan, Mr. Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala II, Mr. Siegfried
Herzog and Mr. Joachim von Amsberg |
Lastly, several analysts attempted a forecast for 2007. The
general consensus was that the economy would probably tick along
at a growth rate of around 5 %. The fiscal position of the country
was lauded by many speakers, and there was broad feeling that
the core economic team of
the government was managing
the economy in a fairly sound manner. What worried
many was
the negative trend in domestic investment and
capital formation and the low rate of job creation.
Among the domestic risks cited were a danger of fiscal profligacy
in connection with the 2007 elections and a continued diversion
of political attention due to the charter change debate.
The conference has served to draw significant public attention
to the needs for policy and institutional reform. Some key speeches
have been widely reported in the media. Anyone interested in
a blueprint for reforms would have found valuable inspiration.
The crucial question is
how to reform institutions so
that they contribute to economic efficiency. The success
of the Philippines in bringing the fiscal situation under control
and of making the Bangko Sentral independent show that there
is reason for hope.
This program has been very much in keeping with one of the
focus areas of the Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung, namely to promote
the insight that countries that promote economic freedom tend
to be more successful in fostering economic growth, poverty
reduction and human development. A lot of studies have been
done on this, including an annual Index of the Economic Freedom
of the World, to which the Foundation contributes. "In
a time when the gains achieved by the World Trade Organization
are under threat and illiberal economic policies stage something
of a comeback, this message is all the more needed,"
said FNF Manila Resident Representative Mr. Siegfried Herzog.
Those interested in this work may visit the website www.freetheworld.com
In Asia, we are working with a loose network of researchers
affiliated with this approach. For more information, see www.fnfasia.org/efn/