The Media in Elections
By Ronald Meinardus
Manila — The media has become a decisive factor in electoral
politics in democracies in all parts of the world. I would even
argue that it is impossible to find a democratic country today
in which a candidate could win a majority without using the media.
Whenever political parties or candidates campaign their image
in the media is a major concern.
While the supremacy of mass media in democratic political contests
is not new, the way politicians make use of the media to get their
message across has changed over time. Political communication
strategies, to a great extent, are technology-driven - and depend
on the accessibility of specific media to the targeted electorate.
While media-availability differs from one country to another,
in most parts of the world television plays the dominant role
in political campaigns - followed by radio and the press. Radio
programs are of particular importance in less developed countries
where not every household can afford a TV-set. While the impact
of the printed media should not be underestimated, its role has
largely evolved to that of an agenda-setter. Trends and stories
reported in newspapers are frequently picked up by TV and radio-journalists
and “rebroadcasted” over the airwaves.
A relatively new vehicle for political communication is the internet.
By international comparison, the usage of the internet for campaign
purposes varies and reflects what is commonly termed the growing
digital divide. In highly developed countries such as South Korea
or the United States of America, no serious political campaign
can be carried out without at least one website. On the other
hand, political online communication in less developed Asian countries
such as the Philippines, Indonesia or Cambodia is still in its
infancy. Roh, Moo-hyun would probably not be the president of
South Korea today had it not been for an unparalleled campaign
of mostly young dedicated supporters using the internet. At the
same time, political websites and online communications hardly
play any role at all in the run-up to the elections in the Philippines
in May 2004. The explanation for this discrepancy is simple. While
South Korea has one of the highest internet penetration rates
in the world, internet access in the Philippines is comparatively
low at below five percent of the population.
This is not to say that political campaigners in the Philippines
shy away from modern technology. The Philippines is known as the
“texting-capital” of the world. According to industry sources,
the 80 million Filipinos send some 150 million SMS (short messaging
service) or text messages every day. Texting is not only the cheapest
way to communicate over a distance, it has also become a way of
life in this South East Asian nation. ”The world will be looking
at how we use SMS during the coming elections”, says Roland Benzon,
Associate of Chikka Asia, a leading provider of mobile messaging
services. It will be interesting to observe how the cell phone
technology that was originally invented for interpersonal and
private communication is transformed into a mass media for political
campaigns.
The classical role of the media in a democracy is to inform the
citizens and to control those with power. Is the media living
up to this expectation? In the Philippines, many observers tend
to give a negative answer. An often-heard complaint is that media-reports
tend to be biased and pursue a hidden political agenda. An attentive
reader of Philippine newspapers easily discerns that the line
dividing news reports and commentaries is often blurred. “There
is manipulation because there is a lot of money to be made”, says
Paulynn Sicam, a Philippine columnist. So-called “envelopmental”
journalism is not confined to the Philippines. There, as in other
countries, the tendency to pay journalists under the table is
particularly rampant in the run up to elections.
The power of the media is, however, not limited to the control
over what is published and what is not. In some countries, and
here the Philippines is a showcase, the media functions as a gateway
for political careers. Florangel Rosario Braid, President of the
Asian Institute of Journalism and Communication in Manila, laments
that her country has become a “showbiztocracy”. She is not alone
in criticizing that today, more than ever, film studios and TV
channels have to a large extent replaced the parties as a recruiting
ground for political candidates. “The strongest political party
in the country is ABS-CBN”, says political strategist Jose Leviste
referring to the most important Philippine broadcasting network
that employed the two main contenders for the vice presidency
in the May 2004 elections, Senator Loren Legarda and her Senate-colleague
Noli de Castro.
While these two broadcasters-turned-politicians may rightly claim
that they have gathered political experience as members of the
Philippine Senate, the person many Filipinos wish to see as their
next president has no experience in public service at all. Fernando
Poe Jr. is the undisputed action-king of Philippine movies, but
also an absolute political novice, who was lured by the opposition
into running for the highest elective office not because of his
programmatic positions (these remain nebulous to this day) but
solely for his celebrity-status.
Often, the media is made responsible for the low level of political
discourse. While this finger pointing may be partly justified
in some countries, it would be too simple to just blame the low
quality of a country’s political culture solely on the defaults
of the media. At the end of the day, media-products are just like
any other item for consumption. Their success or failure – and
with it their political clout – depend on the people who choose
to consume them. One always has the option to turn off the TV
and the radio or stop buying a newspaper that doesn’t meet one’s
standards. Ultimately, therefore, the people get the media they
ask for.
The Korea Times: Feb. 2, 2004
© All rights reserved
Dr. Ronald Meinardus was the former Resident Representative
of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation in the Philippines and will
leave Manila late September for a new posting in the Middle East.
He writes a blog at www.myliberaltimes.com