Elections and Democracy
By Ronald Meinardus
In most countries, elections attract enormous public attention.
This is not surprising as these political exercises constitute
the heart of the democratic order. The selection of political
leaders by the people represents the very basis of democratic
governance. Translated into English, the originally Greek word
"Democracy" means "rule of the people."
In most democracies today, popular political participation is
confined to the selection of leaders on election-day every few
years. Still, the exercise of popular voting gives political legitimacy
to the people's representatives. This legitimacy is essential
also for the stability of the democratic constitutional order.
In countries where the election process is flawed the political
leadership lacks legitimacy. Often this is the source of political
instability, if not turmoil. Elections and democracy are like
two wheels of a cart. If you remove one wheel the vehicle cannot
move forward.
Democratic rule is inconceivable without elections. A ruler who
does away with elections is rightfully called a dictator. The
very essence of democratic rule lies in the limitation of political
power. In democratic orders, various methods are applied to curb
power.
In a democracy the power of the government is always limited
by time. All constitutions include provisions that limit the terms
of political leaders; in some democratic countries, political
leaders are even explicitly excluded from running for office after
a stated period.
In essence, elections and democracy are about sharing and checking
political power and control. I would argue that the better the
system of checks and balances functions, the better the quality
of democracy in a specific country.
In most democracies today, the division of power is not limited
to the classical separation between the three traditional powers
-- the legislative, the executive and the judiciary. In addition
to what political scientists have termed horizontal division of
power (the separation of the parliament, the government and the
courts), what may be termed a vertical division of power is important.
This refers to the splitting up of power between the central government
and the different units of local autonomy.
The most advanced system of political decentralization is federalism.
While I have heard many arguments for and against this model,
it is undisputed that a federal set-up enhances the system of
checks and balances which is so vital for democratic governance.
While on the one hand democracy is inconceivable without elections,
political elections alone are no guarantee for democratic governance.
Put differently, one cannot be a democrat without supporting elections,
but one can very well conduct elections without being a democrat.
In many parts of the world, democratically elected governments
ignore constitutional limits and deprive the people of basic human
rights and freedoms.
In his acclaimed book The Future of Freedom. Illiberal Democracy,
American journalist Fareed Zakaria enumerates a long list of what
he terms "elected autocrats". He writes that, "Over
the past decade, elected governments claiming to represent the
people have steadily encroached on the powers and the rights of
other elements of society." The author draws a clear line
between liberal democracy and the illiberal deviation which he
calls "illiberal democracy".
While liberal democracy is characterized by competitive elections,
the rule of law, the separation of powers and the protection of
basic political liberties, "illiberal democracy" may
well permit competitive elections, but shows little respect for
the aforementioned basic liberal rights.
For a country to qualify as a liberal democracy the holding of
political elections every few years is not enough. "As a
sparrow doesn't make a spring, an election doesn't make democracy,"
Sam Rainsy, the leader of the Cambodian opposition said at the
recent Liberal International Asian Conference held in Taiwan which
was attended by more than 100 political leaders from over twenty
countries.
While Fareed Zakharia focuses on "illiberal democracies"
in central Asia, the Muslim world and Russia in his book, Cambodia
is also a good example of a country with elections but serious
shortcomings in terms of the rule of law and the respect for civil
liberties. "The real difficulty," says Sam Rainsy, "is
the communist legacy and the lack of separation between the state
apparatus and the ruling party." This brings us back to the
importance of checks and balances.
Addressing the leaders from liberal parties at the conference
in Taiwan, Lord Russel-Johnston, the former president of the Parliamentary
Assembly of the Council of Europe, defined five key features which
-- from a liberal vantage point -- are necessary for the consolidation
of democracy.
First, the electorate should be offered a political choice. This
is where ideological political parties with programs or platforms
come in. Second, the opposition should be an integral part of
democracy. For liberal democracy to flourish, the opposition must
defend the political structures and be loyal to the constitution.
Third, the bureaucracy must be reliable and fourth, the rule of
law must be respected by everyone.
According to Lord Russel, the final prerequisite for a liberal
democracy is the existence of civil society made up of non-governmental
organizations, trade unions and other interest groups. Alongside
the elected political establishment, the state institutions and
the political parties these groups play an important complimentary
role in a liberal democracy.
In a way, civil society-groups form a bridge between the people
and the state. They offer an avenue for political participation
which representative parliamentary rule and elections with intervals
of some years cannot possibly provide. The relevance of civil
society increases in societies whose political institutions lack
maturity. Unfortunately this is the case in most new democracies.
The Jakarta Post: March 12, 2004
© All rights reserved
Dr. Ronald Meinardus was the former Resident Representative
of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation in the Philippines and will
leave Manila late September for a new posting in the Middle East.
He writes a blog at www.myliberaltimes.com